Beedy v. CBRE Inc. et al
| Tamisha Beedy |
| CBRE Inc. and Dale Belknap |
| 1:2024cv00383 |
| July 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER transferring case from the docket of the Honorable Douglas R. Cole to the Office of the Clerk for reassignment to the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 7/22/24. (sct)
|
| Intra District Transfer - Case transferred to Columbus as case number 2:24-cv-3750. This case has been closed and all future filings should be made in case number 2:24-cv-3750. (sct) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (kh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Dale Belknap, CBRE Inc., originally filed on 6/14/2024 in Franklin County Court of Common Pleas by Tamisha Beedy. (kh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin County Common Pleas Court, case number 24CV004712 ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10072907), filed by CBRE Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Affidavit of Dale Belknap, #4 State Court Filings) (Murch, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
