Adkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Amy Juanita Adkins |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
1:2024cv00480 |
September 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Peter B Silvain |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (jmb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-10149657) of Robert Parker by Plaintiff Amy Juanita Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Farrell, Clifford) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10149622), filed by Amy Juanita Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Farrell, Clifford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.