Rhoten v. The Central Railroad Company of Indiana et al
| Albert Rhoten |
| INEOS Styrolution America LLC, Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, Inc., The Central Railroad Company of Indiana, ABC Corporations 1-20 and INEOS ABS (USA) LLC |
| 1:2024cv00542 |
| September 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against ABC Corporations 1-20, Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, Inc., INEOS ABS (USA) LLC, INEOS Styrolution America LLC, The Central Railroad Company of Indiana, filed by Albert Rhoten in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas A2404346 on 09/26/2024. (bjc) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A2404346 ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10185079), filed by INEOS ABS (USA) LLC, INEOS Styrolution America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State court documents, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Ken Hale, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Hastings, Kerry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
