Ekeh v. Penske Truck Leasing Cooperation L.P. et al
| Anthony Ekeh |
| Penske Truck Leasing Cooperation L.P., Milos Mitic, Toni, Ivan, Jermaine Rocker, Elvis Rambanapas, Brandon Turner, Mallory Horton and Clark County Municpal Court |
| 1:2025cv00436 |
| June 27, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Other Fraud |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to #8 Order signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 8/1/25. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the R&Rs (1:25-cv-436, Doc. #7 ; 1:25-cv-437, Doc. #6 ). Specifically, the Court DISMISSES Ekeh's claims against the Clark County Municipal Court WITH PREJUDICE, and the Court DISMISSES Ekeh's other claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE, which, in turn, means the Court DISMISSES his Complaints in both cases. Beyond that, the Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) (3), that an appeal of this Order would not be made in good faith, thus DENYING Ekeh leave to appeal IFP. But as a non-prisoner, Ekeh may nonetheless apply directly to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to proceed IFP in that court, should he wish. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 8/1/25. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The complaint against defendant Clark County Municipal Court be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). 2. The complaints against all other defendants be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). 3. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Objections to R&R due by 7/21/25. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/7/25. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Anthony Ekeh. (sct) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants, filed by Anthony Ekeh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (sct) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/7/25. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that this case and case number 1:25-cv-437 ARE related. Cases are assigned to Judge Douglas R. Cole for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 7/1/2025. (kev)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) (kev).
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony Ekeh. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Court Statement, #4 Exhibit, #5 Motion to Dismiss, #6 Waiver, #7 Summons Form, #8 Envelope) (jmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
