Jagtap v. The Christ Hospital
| Shyamala Jagtap |
| The Christ Hospital |
| 1:2025cv00539 |
| August 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 01/08/2026. (kaf)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant The Christ Hospital. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order) (Parrish, Tyler) |
|
Filing 7
CALENDAR ORDER: Settlement Demand can be made at any time. Response to Settlement Demand due 30 days following Defendant's receipt of Demand. Initial Disclosures due by 12/2/2025. Protective Order due by 1/5/2026. Motions to amend/add parties due by 1/5/2026. Motions related to pleadings due by 2/2/2026. Plaintiff's Experts due by 2/2/2026. Defendant's Experts due by 3/2/2026. Rebuttal Experts due by 5/1/2026. Non-Expert (Fact) Witnesses due by 5/1/2026. Discovery due by 7/1/2026. Dispositive motions due by 8/17/2026. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 11/18/2025. (kaf)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Matthew W. McFarland: Preliminary Pretrial Conference held on 11/18/2025. Present by phone were Attorney David Torchia on behalf of Plaintiff and Attorney Tyler Parrish on behalf of Defendant. The Court discussed this matter with counsel and will file a calendar order by separate docket entry. (kaf) |
| Filing 6 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Shyamala Jagtap. (Torchia, David) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants The Christ Hospital, THE CHRIST HOSPITAL identifying Corporate Parent THE CHRIST HOSPITAL for The Christ Hospital.. (Mattingly, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler Parrish for Defendant The Christ Hospital (Parrish, Tyler) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by All Defendants. (Mattingly, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael B Mattingly for Defendant The Christ Hospital (Mattingly, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against The Christ Hospital ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10625546), filed by Shyamala Jagtap. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Notice of Right to Sue, #2 Appendix Civil Cover Sheet) (Torchia, David) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kev) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jagtap v. The Christ Hospital | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shyamala Jagtap | |
| Represented By: | David Gerard Torchia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Christ Hospital | |
| Represented By: | Tyler Parrish |
| Represented By: | Michael B Mattingly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
