Lincoln v. All-Lift Systems, LLC
| Michael Lincoln |
| All-Lift Systems, LLC |
| 1:2026cv00514 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The case is hereby TRANSFERRED from the docket of the Honorable Douglas R. Cole to the Office of the Clerk for reassignment to the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 5/27/26. (mas)
|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed on 4/22/2026 in Licking County Court of Common Pleas (Case no. 2026-CV-00822) against All-Lift Systems, LLC, by Michael Lincoln. (jmt) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (jmt) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties are notified that if all parties consent, a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form may be accessed at the following link: #AO-085. The consent form should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent form unless all parties have signed the consent. (jmt) |
| Intra District Transfer - Case transferred to Columbus as case number 2:26-cv-634. This case has been closed and all future filings should be made in case number 2:26-cv-634. (mas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Defendant All-Lift Systems, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, Civil and Supplemental Cover Sheets (Shanahan, Madeline) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant All-Lift Systems, LLC. (Shanahan, Madeline) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Licking County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2026-CV-00822 ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-11055576), filed by All-Lift Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Screenshot, #3 Exhibit C - Screenshot, #4 Exhibit D - Screenshot, #5 Exhibit E - Demand Letter) (Shanahan, Madeline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lincoln v. All-Lift Systems, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Lincoln | |
| Represented By: | William T. LaGrone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: All-Lift Systems, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Madeline Shanahan |
| Represented By: | Todd Franklin Palmer, I |
| Represented By: | Emma Margaret Tomsick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
