Gipson v. Hamilton County Ohio
Plaintiff: Timothy W. G. Gipson
Defendant: Hamilton County Ohio
Case Number: 1:2026cv00536
Filed: June 1, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jeffery P Hopkins
Referring Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2026 Filing 7 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Timothy W. G. Gipson. (jmt)
June 23, 2026 Filing 6 Motion for Extension of Time - "Excusable Neglect", Mail improperly Routed Late by Plaintiff Timothy W. G. Gipson. (kev)
June 9, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE of Transcript(s) of Proceedings from Trial Court by Plaintiff Timothy W. G. Gipson. (jmt)
June 8, 2026 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's state court removal action be REMANDED to the state court. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/8/26. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 8, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, case number A2600654, filed by Timothy W. G. Gipson. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (sct)
June 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 6/8/26. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 1, 2026 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy W. G. Gipson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Motion to Keep Separate Trials, #5 Motion to Dismiss, #6 Reply in Support, #7 Motion to Consolidate, #8 Motion to Dismiss motion) (jmt)
June 1, 2026 CLERK'S NOTICE: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties are notified that if all parties consent, a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form may be accessed at the following link: #AO-085. The consent form should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent form unless all parties have signed the consent. (jmt)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gipson v. Hamilton County Ohio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy W. G. Gipson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hamilton County Ohio
Represented By: Jonathan Dwayne Daugherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?