Telesis Technologies v. Technifor Inc, et al
| Telesis Technologies Inc |
| Technifor Inc, Technifor SA and 114 quai du Rhone |
| 2:2003cv00015 |
| January 3, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Algenon L Marbley |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2003. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER for Return of Cash Bond by Judge Algenon L. Marbley: the cash bond of $100.00 to be returned to Thompson, Hines, LLP (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (sln)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of submission of disc by plaintiff Telesis Technologies ( no pgs: 2) (pl) |
| Filing 19 CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Algenon L. Marbley terminating case (cc: all counsel) (sln) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Algenon L. Marbley ; Show cause conference set for 8:30 3/4/03 on why defendants should not be held in contempt of Court for failure to comply with discovery (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 2) (sem)
|
| Filing 15 Web Traffic Report filed by defendant Technifor Inc ( no pgs: SEALED) (sem) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Algenon L. Marbley granting motion for order to file evidence under seal [11-1] (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (sem)
|
| Filing 16 REPLY by plaintiff Telesis Technologies to dfts' response to their motion to expedite discovery [10-1] ( no pgs: 6) (sem) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE (memo in opposition) by defendant Technifor Inc to pltf's motion to expedite discovery [10-1] ( no pgs: 5 + exh) (sem) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by defendant Technifor Inc to expedite discovery ( no pgs: 5) (sem) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by defendant Technifor Inc for order to file evidence under seal ( no pgs: 3) (sem) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by plaintiff Telesis Technologies to expedite discovery ( no pgs: 5 + exh) (sem) |
| Filing 9 Supplemental memorandum by plaintiff Telesis Technologies to their motion for temporary restraining order [2-1] and for preliminary injunction [2-2] ( no pgs: 4 + exh) (sem) |
| RECEIPT of tro order received by Charles Ticknor III and Robert Kincaid Jr on 1/14/03 (sem) |
| Bond in amount of $ 100.00 filed by plaintiff Telesis Technologies for filing of TRO (sem) |
|
Filing 8
AGREED ORDER by Judge Algenon L. Marbley granting motion for temporary restraining order [2-1]; Plaintiff shall post a $100.00 with the clerk (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 3) (sem)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Algenon L. Marbley staying the pltf's motion for expedited discovery (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 2) (sem)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Algenon L. Marbley ; In-court hearing set for 9:00 3/17/03 in re motion for preliminary injunction (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (sem)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Algenon L. Marbley ; Informal preliminary conference set for 10:00 1/7/03 (cc: all counsel) ( no pgs: 1) (sem)
|
| Summons issued as to defendant Technifor SA (sem) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by plaintiff Telesis Technologies to expedite discovery ( no pgs: 5 + exh) (sem) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of notification filed by plaintiff Telesis Technologies ( no pgs: 3) (sem) |
| Filing 2 MOTION by plaintiff Telesis Technologies for temporary restraining order , for preliminary injunction ( no pgs: 14 + exh) (sem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (referred to Mag. Judge Terence P. Kemp ) ( no. pgs: 16 + exh) (sem) |
| Filing Fee Paid: on 1/3/03 in the amount of $ 150.00, receipt # 234081. (sem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
