Rare Coin Alliance, Ltd. v. Island Rarities, Inc et al
Case Number: 2:2005cv00891
Filed: September 27, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge: Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting the parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to respond to Barta's Motion to Transfer Venue. RCA shall respond on or before 12/10/2010. Barta shall reply on or before 01/05/2011. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 11/30/2010. (dh1)
October 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 OPINION AND ORDER granting 60 the combined motion to reactivate this case and to substitute Rare Coin Alliance, Ltd for Island Rarities in the third-party complaint against James Barta. It is ORDERED that the stay on the proceedings in this case is lifted. It is further ORDERED that Rare Coin Alliance, Ltd. be substituted for third-party plaintiff Island Rarities, Inc. The Clerk is DIRECTED to return this case to the active docket of Judge Sargus. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to reactivate the motions pending at the time the stay was imposed (38, 54, 48). Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 10/27/2010. (dh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rare Coin Alliance, Ltd. v. Island Rarities, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?