Ferron v. Echostar Satellite, LLC et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv00453
Filed: June 12, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 353 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 328 Renewed MOTION for the Imposition of Discovery Sanctions Upon Defendants E-Management Group, Inc., 411 Web Directory and Dish Pronto, Inc. and Their Respective Counsel is DENIED. Within 7 days from the date of this Opinion and Order, counsel for Dish Pronto and 411 Web are ORDERED to advise plaintiff's counsel whether or not these defendants have preserved electronic or paper versions of the disputed e-mails and, if they have preserved copies, to produce such copies to plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 07/29/2009. (sr) Modified text on 8/3/2009 (er1 ).
February 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 151 OPINION AND ORDER granting 79 Motion for Reconsideration & dismissing 80 Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge - primary expert disclosures due 5/1/2008; responsive disclosures due 6/1/2008; discovery due 7/1/2008; MSJ due 8/1/2008. Signed by Norah McCann King on 2/6/2008. (kk2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferron v. Echostar Satellite, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?