Gunasekera v. Irwin et al
| 2:2006cv00732 |
| August 28, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Norah McCann King |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
AGREED JUDGMENT ENTRY. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 03/07/2011. (cw)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/28/2011. (cw)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 67 Motion to Modify Order Setting Trial Date and Final Pretrial Conference. The Parties are each ORDERED to identify their expert(s), if any, on or before January 14, 2011 and to submit expert report(s), if any, on or before February 7, 2011. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 1/6/2011. (cw)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 51 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 10/06/2010. (cw)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants shall provide Dr. Gunasekera with the name-clearing hearing outlined in this Opinion. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 1/11/2010. (cw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gunasekera v. Irwin et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
