Niklos v. Mount Carmel Health System
Kelly L Niklos |
Mount Carmel Health System |
2:2007cv01174 |
November 13, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
DELAWARE |
Gregory L Frost |
Norah McCann King |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 JOINT STIPULATION of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Kelly L Niklos & Defendant Mount Carmel Health System (Reeve, Gary) Modified on 6/9/2008 to correct text & filers (kk2). |
Filing 14 Amended NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Plaintiff Kelly L Niklos (Kennedy, Nicholas) Modified on 3/25/2008 to clarify text(kk2). |
Filing 13 NOTICE by Plaintiff Kelly L Niklos Substitution of Counsel (Kennedy, Nicholas) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Final Pretrial and Trial (sem1, ) |
![]() |
Filing 10 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 4/15/2008. Motions to Amend due by 4/15/2008. Primary Expert due by 7/30/2008. Rebuttal Expert due by 8/30/2008. Settlement Week in 9/2008. Discovery due by 11/30/2008. Dispositive motions in 1/2009. Final Pretrial Conference in 5/2009. Signed by Norah McCann King on 3/05/08. (rew ) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Defendant Mount Carmel Health System. (Armstrong, Kristopher) |
Filing 8 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Kelly L Niklos. (Reeve, Gary) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 3/5/2008 @ 02:30 PM in chambers before Norah McCann King. (jm1, ) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: RE: #5 Mount Carmel Health System answer due 3/3/2008. (sr) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Mount Carmel Health System, Trinity Health identifying Corporate Parent Trinity Health for Mount Carmel Health System.. (Armstrong, Kristopher) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION re #2 Complaint To Extend Time to Move or Plead in Response to Complaint by Defendant Mount Carmel Health System. (Armstrong, Kristopher) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mount Carmel Health System. (er ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Plaintiff Kelly L Niklos, Defendant Mount Carmel Health System. Mount Carmel Health System served on 1/22/2008, answer due 2/11/2008. (Kennedy, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Kelly L Niklos with JURY DEMAND against Mount Carmel Health System. (rew ) |
Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet. (rew ) |
Filing fee: $ 350.00, receipt number 00310. (rew ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Niklos v. Mount Carmel Health System | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kelly L Niklos | |
Represented By: | Gary A. Reeve |
Represented By: | Nicholas E Kennedy |
Represented By: | Laren E Knoll |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mount Carmel Health System | |
Represented By: | Manuel Jose Asensio, III |
Represented By: | Kristopher J Armstrong |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.