Sieng v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Sieng v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Sieng v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Virsna Sieng
Respondent:	Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Case Number:	2:2008cv00044
Filed:	January 15, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge:	Mark R. Abel
Presiding Judge:	Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 2, 2010	Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER - The petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED; the Report and Recommendation 12 is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED; Petitioner's Motion for judgment in his favor and for an evidentiary hearing 15 is DENIED; Petitioner's alternative request to withdraw his unexhausted claim five from the petition and proceed on his remaining exhausted claims is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 6/2/10. (jk)
June 9, 2009	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice unless petitioner notifies the Court within ten (10) days of his deletion of his unexhausted claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 6/09/09. (rew, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 2, 2010

Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER - The petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED; the Report and Recommendation 12 is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED; Petitioner's Motion for judgment in his favor and for an evidentiary hearing 15 is DENIED; Petitioner's alternative request to withdraw his unexhausted claim five from the petition and proceed on his remaining exhausted claims is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 6/2/10. (jk)

June 9, 2009

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice unless petitioner notifies the Court within ten (10) days of his deletion of his unexhausted claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 6/09/09. (rew, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sieng v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Virsna Sieng
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?