Jackson v. City Of Gahanna, Ohio et al
| Benjamin Jackson |
| City Of Gahanna, Ohio, Sheila Murphy and Dennis Murphy |
| 2:2008cv00068 |
| January 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER denying 76 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 7/6/2011. (cw)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER denying 54 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/9/2011. (cw)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER SETTING A TELEPHONIC Status Conference for 12/16/2010 03:30 PM before Judge Algenon L. Marbley. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 12/6/2010. (cw)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/23/2010. (cw)
|
|
Filing
27
Discovery Conference Order: Defendants have the right to resume Jacksons deposition and have him respond to the line of questioning. If Jackson invokes the privilege against self-incrimination, that will be the end of the enquiry. Either party may, within ten (10) days after this Order is filed, file and serve on the opposing party a motion for reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 9/09/09. (rew )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
