Watkins v. New Albany Plain Local Schools et al
| Erica D. Watkins |
| New Albany Plain Local Schools, Scott Stewart, Richard Strangers, Otis Winston, Rex Reeder, Richard Fisher, Regina Lemaster, Village of New Albany, Joel Strahler and Gerald Nixon |
| 2:2008cv00134 |
| February 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| James L Graham |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
OPINION AND ORDER entering judgment in favor of Amanda Watkins and against Gerald Nixon. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 05/23/11. (ds)
|
|
Filing
103
OPINION AND ORDER granting 72 Motion for Summary Judgment and 78 Motion for Summary Judgment. A FPT Conf will be scheduled. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 5/10/2010. (bw)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER denying 84 Motion to Compel and Copy of Prosecutor's File & granting 91 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 3/10/2010. (kjm1)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 5/28/2009 granting 26 the motion to Amend the Complaint and Establishing a New Case Schedule. Primary Expert due by 8/9/2009. Rebuttal Expert due by 9/24/2009. Discovery due by 11/9/2009. Dispositive motions due by 12/9/2009. (pes1) Modified on 5/29/2009 to add document link (kk2).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
