Clumm v. Manes et al
Plaintiff: William A Clumm
Defendant: James Manes, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, Mark R Weaver, Issac Brant Ledman & Teetor, Dennis Pemberthy and Does
Case Number: 2:2008cv00366
Filed: April 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: ROSS
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge: George C Smith
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 9-9-10. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00366-GCS -NMK, 2:08-cv-00567-GCS-NMK (ga)
May 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 66 OPINION AND ORDER : Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, Doc. No. 59, case no. 08-366 and Doc. No.47, case no. 08-567, is DENIED in part. Plaintiffs motion is STAYED pending resolution of Defendant Manes motion for summary judgment. Defendant Manes Motion for Protective Order, Doc. No. 57, case no. 08-366 and Doc. No. 46, case no. 08-567, is likewise STAYED pending resolution of her motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike, Doc. No. 62, case no. 08- 366 and Doc. No. 51, case no. 08- 567, is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 5/27/10. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00366-GCS -NMK, 2:08-cv-00567-GCS-NMK (rew)
May 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER granting (50) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying (59) Motion to Compel in case 2:08-cv-00366-GCS-NMK; granting (39) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying (47) Motion to Compel in case 2:08-cv-00567-GCS-NMK. Defendant Stroock Stroock & Lavan LLP Dismissed from this action. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 5/26/10. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00366-GCS-NMK, 2:08-cv-00567-GCS-NMK (lvw1)
August 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER objections to the Report and Recommendation are DENIED and denying 31 Motion to Dismiss; denying 32 Motion to Dismiss; denying 11 Cross Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process; denying 12 Motion to Dismiss in case 2:08-cv- 00366-GCS-NMK; denying (5) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying (6) Motion to Dismiss; denying (18) Motion to Dismiss; denying (19) Motion to Dismiss; denying (20) Motion to Dismiss in case 2:08-cv-00567-GCS-NMK. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 8/12/09. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00366-GCS-NMK, 2:08-cv-00567-GCS-NMK (lvw1, )
June 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED, Plaintiff's Motion under Rule 60, Doc. # 28 , 2:08-cv-366 is DENIED and Motion doc. # 17 2:08-cv-567 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion To Strike, Doc. No. # 18 2:08-cv-366 is DENIED and Mot ion # 11 2:08-cv-567 is DENIED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to promptly provide a copy of the Complaint in the action 2:08-cv-567, summons and Marshal service forms for each of the three named defendants. It is RECOMMENDED that the motions to dismiss file d by defendants Manes and Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, LLP, Doc. # 11 , # 12 , # 31 , # 32 , 2:08-cv-366; Doc # 5 , # 6 , # 18 # 19 # 20 , 2:08-cv-567, be DENIED. ( Objections to R&R due by 7/16/2009). Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 06/25/2009. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00366-GCS-NMK, 2:08-cv-00567-GCS-NMK (sr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clumm v. Manes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William A Clumm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Manes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark R Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Issac Brant Ledman & Teetor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Pemberthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?