Wagner et al v. Circle W Mastiffs et al
| Fredericka Wagner, Flying W Farms, American Mastiff Breeders Council, Connie Hammond, Diane St. Martin, Bill Berger, Sandy Berger, Cameran Pridmore, Jim Taylor, Sandy Taylor, Kerry Mikalchus, Tammy Venkler, Kevin Ware and Melanie Ware |
| Circle W Mastiffs, Jennifer Williamson and Craig Williamson |
| 2:2008cv00431 |
| May 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| GUERNSEY |
| Terence P Kemp |
| George C Smith |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
241
ORDER denying 232 Motion for Attorney Fees and granting in part and denying in part Williamsons' Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 9/8/14. (lvw1)
|
|
Filing
240
ORDER granting 229 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 7/16/14. (lvw1)
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER re 133 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Circle W Mastiffs, Craig Williamson, Jennifer Williamson. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 3/31/14. (lvw1)
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER denying ( 183 in case 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK & (168) in case 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK) Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 8/19/2013. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK, 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK (kk2)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER: Tammy Venkler and Candance Ware are ORDERED to make a status report or call Judge Abel chambers w/in 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 5/22/13. (sh1)
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER denying ( 174 in case 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK & (159) in case 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK) Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 5/14/2013. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK, 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK (kk2)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER: each party is DIRECTED to provide Judge Abel their settlement evaluation and settlement position by March 18, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 2/21/13. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK, 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK (sh1)
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER granting in part and denying in part (139) Motion to Compel in case 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK; granting in part and denying in part (125) Motion to Compel in case 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 11/28/12. (jcw1)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER: this case is set for Mediation with Magistrate Judge Abel on December 17, 2012 at 9:30 AM in Rm. 218. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 10/25/12. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK, 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK (sh1)
|
|
Filing
137
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 6/12/12. (jcw1)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER denied as moot (74) Motion to Compel; denying (75) Motion to Amend/Correct; denied (65) Motion to Amend; denying (78) Motion to Amend/Correct; denied as moot (80) Motion ; denied as moot (85) Motion for Reconsideration ; denied as moot (93) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denied as moot (94) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denied as moot (95) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply all in case (2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK); Order den ied as moot (64) Motion to Compel; denying (68) Motion to Amend/Correct; denied (60) Motion to Amend; denied as moot (70) Motion ; denied as moot (75) Motion for Reconsideration ; denied as moot (83) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response /Reply ; denied as moot (84) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply All in case 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK - Objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 01/14/2011. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK, 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK (sr)
|
|
Filing
65
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part (40) Motion to Dismiss in case 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK and denying (45) Alternative MOTION to Amend in case 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 8-10-10. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00431-GCS -TPK, 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK (ga) Modified on 8/11/2010 to correct text to add text re mtn to amend (kk2)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting (53) plaintiff Tammy Venkler's motion to dismiss her claims with prejudice; denying 55 Motion for Attorney Fees in case 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK; denying 55 Motion for Attorney Fees in case 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 6/29/10. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK, 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK (lvw1)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 3-12-10. (ga)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #(39 in 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK) Motion to Stay Discovery pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 12/22/2009. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
45
OPINION AND ORDER: The plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. (Doc 25 in case no 2:09-cv-172 and doc 36 in case no 2:08-cv-431.) The defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc 13 in case no 2:09-cv- 172) and motion to stay discovery pending adjudication of their motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc 21 in case no 2:09-cv-172) are denied as moot. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 8/17/2009. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00431-GCS-TPK, 2:09-cv-00172-GCS-TPK (er1 )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Consolidate Cases; denying 8 Motion to Change Venue; denying 9 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 3/25/09. (lvw1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
