Young v. Warden
Petitioner: Cory Young
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 2:2008cv00558
Filed: June 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: GALLIA
Presiding Judge: Mark R. Abel
Presiding Judge: John D. Holschuh
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPINION & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - this action is Dismissed. Signed by Judge John D. Holschuh on 11/9/09. (sln)
October 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed - objections due w/in ten (10) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 10/23/2009. (kjm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cory Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?