Ferron v. Subscriberbase Holdings, Inc. et al
| John W Ferron |
| Subscriberbase Holdings, Inc., Subscriberbase, Inc. and Consumer Research Corporation |
| 2:2008cv00760 |
| August 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| DELAWARE |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 11/16/2010. This case is closed. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER: Within thirty (30) days, Mr. Ferron shall provide defendants with the information they have requested concerning the IP address assigned to this office email account, which other email accounts, if any, he registered with them, and what cases he has participated in since 2000 either as counsel or a party that raise claims under the OCSPA, unless such cases involve matters completely unrelated to telephone or email advertisements or solicitations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 3/22/2010. (kjm1)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The motion is granted with prejudice with regard to Count Two of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 9 ), granted without prejudice with regard to Count Three, and denied with regard to Counts One and Four. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 03/10/09. (dh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
