Griffin et al v. Terry Collins et al
Mark Griffin, Sr., David A. Hess and Thomas Griffin |
Terry Collins, M. Eberlin-Miller and W. Hixenbaugh |
2:2009cv00210 |
April 3, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
BELMONT |
Norah McCann King |
Edmund A Sargus |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 06/28/2010. This case is closed. (dh) |
Filing 27 ORDER adopting and affirming the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The motion for default judgment filed by Plaintiff Mark Griffin, Sr. 17 is denied. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 10/27/09. (dh) |
Filing 19 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is RECOMMENDED that the motion for default judgment filed by Plaintiff Mark Griffin, Sr., # 17 be DENIED. If plaintiffs intend to respond to the motion to dismiss, they shall do so within 20 days of the date of this Order and Report and Recommendation. (Objections to R&R due by 10/5/2009). Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 09/18/2009. (sr) |
Filing 12 ORDER. The U.S. Marshal is DIRECTED to effect service of process on each named defendant, who shall have 45 days after service of process to respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff Mark Griffin's motion 11 , is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 06/26/2009. (sr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.