EBS of Ohio v. United Re AG et al
| EBS of Ohio |
| United Re AG and Hugh Scott |
| 2:2009cv00836 |
| September 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 41 Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) of Plaintiff EBS of Ohio, Inc. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 12/18/2012. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER: Plf shall have until 5/11/12 to file request to dismiss; Clerk disrected to mail a copy of this order to Josiah Mason. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 3/27/12. (sh1)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: Attorney Rex H Elliott; Adam Paul Richards; Bradley A Strickling; John C Camillus and Charles Horne Cooper, Jr terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 1/6/12. (sh1)
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION AND ORDER granting 7 EBS's Motion to Dismiss Fraud Counterclaim and the counterclaims of United Re and Hugh Scott are dismissed. The Motion of Plaintiff, EBS of Ohio, Inc., to Dismiss United Re AG's Amended Counterclaim 12 is dismissed as moot. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 09/27/2010. (dh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
