Barnhart v. Mowry et al
| Kimberly A Barnhart |
| Dustin Mowry, Robert L Lilley and City of Logan Ohio |
| 2:2009cv01073 |
| November 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| HOCKING |
| Norah McCann King |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
Opinion and Order granting re 42 MOTION for Sanctions filed by City of Logan Ohio, Dustin Mowry, Robert L Lilley,. The Court ORDERS plaintiff to pay the $350.00 no-show fee assessed by Dr. Schlonsky within ten ( 10) days of the date of this Opinion and Order. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the reasonable attorneys fees and costs that the defendants incurred as a result of filing their Motion for Sanctions. The defendants are O RDERED to provide to plaintiff within ten (10) days of the date of this Opinion and Order a copy of the billing records. Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit payment to the moving defendants no later than November 15, 2010. Pla intiff is ORDERED to submit to a physical examination by Dr. Schlonsky at his office located at 5969 East Broad Street, Suite 402, Columbus, Ohio, at the next available date. Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit to a physical examination by Dr. Schlonsky at his office located at 5969 East Broad Street, Suite 402, Columbus, Ohio, at the next availabl e date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 10/22/10. (rew)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
