National Benefit Programs, Inc. v. Express Scripts, Inc.
Plaintiff: National Benefit Programs, Inc.
Defendant: Express Scripts, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2009cv01156
Filed: December 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: ADAMS
Presiding Judge: Terence P Kemp
Presiding Judge: George C Smith
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 23 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Contract Real Estate
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER granting 15 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 5-17-10. (ga)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Benefit Programs, Inc. v. Express Scripts, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Benefit Programs, Inc.
Represented By: Rex H Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Express Scripts, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?