Abernathy et al v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tracy Abernathy and Lawana Shipley
Defendant: Corinthian Colleges, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2010cv00131
Filed: February 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 201 OPINION and ORDER adopting 198 the Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 167 , 169 and 195 . Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/29/14. (jk1)
August 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 198 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 167 , 169 & 195 Motions for attorney fees. It is RECOMMEDED that the three motions for fees be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/29/14. (jr1)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 131 OPINION AND ORDER finding as moot 117 Motion for Extension of Time, 118 Motion for Extension of Time & 120 Motion to Quash. This case will proceed to trial on August 12, 2013 and will cover Abernathy's quid pro quo sexual harassment and retaliation claims. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 5/20/2013. (kk2)
January 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 116 OPINION AND ORDER FINDING AS MOOT 69 Motion in Limine; 72 Motion for Leave to File; 79 Motion in Limine & 83 Motion in Limine; SUSTAINING 89 Motion in Limine as to the evidence of Abernathy's addiction to pain killer s, theft of pain killers and subsequent loss of her nursing license, witness Brenda Brown's reference to missing medications, Abernathy's shoplifting arrest, the restraining order against Abernathy by her husband, plaintiffs' and other witnesses' off-color remarks in emails and other communications, Brown's past sexual abuse, Brown's breast supplementation surgery, CCI's policy on sexual harassment and investigation into plaintiffs' complaints, and CCI 9;s policy on destroying handwritten notes; The Court DENIES plaintiffs' request for an adverse inference instruction; SUSTAINING 99 Motion in Limine as to the video deposition of Dr. Rodney Tomczak, DENYING the motion as to Lawana Shipley's deposition and plaintiff's evidence of damages, and FINDING AS MOOT defendants' request to limit witnesses & GRANTING 105 Motion to Quash Subpoena of Andrew Ainsworth. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 1/2/2013. (kk2)
April 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting 45 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting 46 Defendant's Motion for Partial Dismissal; adopting and affirming the 61 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 4/10/12. (jk)
March 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 61 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant Corinthian Colleges, Inc.s motion to dismiss claims of Plaintiff Lawana Shipley, Doc. No. 45, and defendant Corinthian Colleges, Inc.s partial motion to dismiss, Doc. No. 46, be GRANTED. re 46 MOTION to dismiss based on claim preclusion filed by Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Objections to R&R due by 3/26/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 3/09/12. (rew)
February 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER : In reference to the telephone conference held on 2/02/12. The parties do not anticipate filing additional dispositive motions, the discovery completion date is EXTENDED to March 31, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 2/08/12. (rew)
December 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER denying 49 notice. Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to discuss the issue with defense counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 12/29/11. (rew)
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Compel. Defendant is ORDERED to respond to the discovery requests within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 9/12/11. (jcw1)
July 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER : Motion to Compel Discovery, Doc. No. 18 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the motion is GRANTED as to plaintiff Lawana Shipley, but DENIED as to plaintiffs Tracy Abernathy and Jennifer Brown. Plaintiff Shipley is ORDERED to respond to defendants discovery requests within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 7/25/11. (rew)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abernathy et al v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Abernathy
Represented By: Rayl L Stepter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawana Shipley
Represented By: Rayl L Stepter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corinthian Colleges, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?