Thomas v. McDowell et al
Plaintiff: Shawn Thomas
Defendant: McDowell, Young, Spohn, Eitell and Unnamed Madison Correctional Institution Medical Staff Members
Case Number: 2:2010cv00152
Filed: February 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: MADISON
Presiding Judge: James L Graham
Presiding Judge: Terence P Kemp
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 200 OPINION AND ORDER denying 182 Motion in Limine; granting 183 Motion in Limine; denying 187 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 10/15/2014. (ds)
September 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 142 ORDER granting 99 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 100 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 137 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 9/12/13. (ds)
August 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 137 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 99 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Cook, Pennington and Eitell & 100 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Shawn Thomas: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' 99 Motion be GRANTED and that Pla intiff's claims against Defendants Eitel and Pennington be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with the PLRA's exhaustion requirements. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's 100 Motion be DENIED. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 8/5/2013. (er1)
November 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 120 OPINION AND ORDER denying 106 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Modify Case Schedule; granting 116 Plaintiff's Motion to correct a scrivener's error identified in the Court's 108 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 11/15/2012. (er1)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 103 Report and Recommendations, DISMISSES the conspiracy claim and DISMISSES claims against defendants Cook, McDowell, and Gleen. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 10/17/12. (ds)
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 71 Amended Complaint: Plaintiff's 90 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint is DENIED. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's medical indifference and conspiracy claims be DIS MISSED for failure to state a claim and that Messrs. Cook, McDowell and Gleen be DISMISSED as Defendants. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 9/25/2012. (er1)
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING "Unnamed Madison Correctional Institution Medical Staff Members" as parties, without prejudice, pursuant to Civil Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge James L Graham on 10/18/11. (ds)
August 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Court DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Unnamed Madison Correctional Institution Medical Staff Members Motion to Dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.ECF No. 25 the Court GRANTS Plaintiff a Rule 4(m) discretionary extension to effect service. Plaintiff must use due diligence to attempt to obtain Defendant Spohns address through the discovery process and must submit an address for service WITHIN (60) SIXTY DAYSOF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ( Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2011). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 8/05/11. (rew)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. McDowell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McDowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eitell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unnamed Madison Correctional Institution Medical Staff Members
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?