Raab v. New England Financial et al
Robert Raab |
New England Financial, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company, Unum Group, Mark Blumenthal and Paul Revere Life Insurance Company |
2:2010cv00186 |
March 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Mark R. Abel |
John D. Holschuh |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER granting 62 Motion to Compel to the extent that Defendant Unum, when the deposition of its Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) representative is taken, is ORDERED to provide testimony concerning Topics 2 and 4 of Plaintiff's Notice of Deposition covering the years 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2009. Plaintiff's motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 8/08/2011. (sr) |
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Attendance at Court-Ordered Independent Medical Examinations (Doc. 18 ). The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff shall submit for one additional examination by a psychologist and one additional examination by a psychiatrist by 5/31/11. Defendants' request for attorney's fees is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Peter C Economus on 3/17/11. (jr1) |
Filing 33 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 12/02/10. (rew) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.