Brown v. Timmerman-Cooper et al
| Frank C Brown, Jr. |
| Kelly E. Mason, Deb Timmerman-Cooper, Curtis Wingard, Decarlo M. Blackwell, Russ Parrish and Ernie Moore |
| 2:2010cv00283 |
| April 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time 117 118 , and adopting 103 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiff's remaining motions 109 115 are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/21/2014. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
103
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 100 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Frank C Brown, Jr. be denied. Objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 7/17/2013. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
99
JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Order filed 04/02/13. This case is CLOSED. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
94
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 88 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings & 90 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted and Mr. Brown's motion for a TRO and for a preliminary injunction be denied. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 2/4/2013. (er1)
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION AND ORDER overruling both parties' objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING 65 the Report and Recommendation. The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 38 is GRANTED as to the class action claims in the complaint, and DENIED in all other respects. The previously-ordered stay of this case is lifted, and the Magistrate Judge is directed to issue a new scheduling order. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 07/10/2012. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
83
OPINION AND ORDER denying (76) Motion for Reconsideration in case 2:10-cv-00283-EAS-TPK; denying (76) Motion for Reconsideration in case 2:10-cv-00352-EAS-TPK; denying (76) Motion for Reconsideration ; denying as moot (77) Motion to Stay in case 2:10-cv-00783-EAS-TPK; denying (61) Motion for Reconsideration in case 2:10-cv-00965-EAS-TPK; and denying (72) Motion for Reconsideration in case 2:10-cv-00967-EAS-TPK. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 07/06/2012. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER denying 38 Defendants' Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and to compel payment of full filing fees. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 01/12/2012. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
65
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is recommended that the motion for judgment on the pleadings (# 38 ) be granted as to the class action claims asserted in the complaint and denied in all other respects. It is further ordered that Mr. Brown's motion for leave to supplement and to strike (# 56 ) and defendants' motion for an extension of time (# 61 ) are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 1/6/12. (jr1)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER correcting docket numbers in Case No. 2:10-cv-967. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/04/2011. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
28
OPINION AND ORDER denying 21 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 22 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 04/14/2011. (sr)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 5 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 11/09/2010. (dh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
