Brown v. Mason et al
| Frank C Brown, Jr. |
| Kelly Mason, Russ Parrish, Leonard Gillam, Richard Reeves, Deb Timmerman Cooper, Doug Richard, Decarlo M. Blackwell, Roy A. Kelly, William R. Barbee and Curtis Wingard |
| 2:2010cv00783 |
| September 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Norah McCann King |
| Michael H. Watson |
| General |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 88 MOTION to Reinstate Action filed by Frank C Brown, Jr. be denied. Objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 7/9/2013. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
87
JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 07/16/2012. This case is CLOSED. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
71
Opinion and Order denying the following motions for injunctive relief: 30 , 41 and 58 . The motion to stay 45 is granted. Plaintiff's motion for an order from the Court compelling a ruling from the Ohio Court of Claims 50 is denied. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 01/12/2012. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted and that all of the claims against the individual defendants be dismissed w/out prejudice to their reinstatement should the Ohio Court of Cla ims ever determine that the waiver of claims against those defendants is void. It is further recommended that if the Court adopts this recommendation and dismisses the case that 30 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Ord er, 41 MOTION for Immediate Interim Order on Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order, 50 MOTION to Compel & 58 MOTION for an Emergency Interim Hearing, Preliminary Injunction and Temporar y Restraining Order be denied as moot. It is further ordered that 38 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint is granted and that 40 MOTION for Extension of Time or Stay on Actions, 57 MOTION for Leave to Supplement Pleadings and/or Strike Therefrom S.D.Ohio CivR. 7.2(a)(2), 46 MOTION to Compel Service & 63 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply are denied. Objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 12/28/2011. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION AND ORDER overruling Plaintiff's objection to the Report and Recommendation 31 . The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 23 is adopted and affirmed. The motion filed by Defendants Blackwell, Timmerman Cooper, Gillam, K elly, Mason, Parrish, Richard and Wingard to dismiss 17 is granted, and the claims against those defendants are dismissed without prejudice to the filing of an amended complaint, within 28 days, which amends Mr. Brown's claim of denial of access to the Courts. Mr. Brown's cross-motion for summary judgment 19 and the defendants' motion to stay 20 are denied. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/03/2011. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
23
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Motion to dismiss # 17 be granted, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment # 19 be denied and Motion to stay # 20 be denied as moot - objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 01/05/2011. (sr)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER overruling Plaintiff's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and ADOPTING the Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 2 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 12/13/2010. (dh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
