Tarazi v. Oshry et al
Plaintiff: Omar Tarazi
Defendant: Pamela G Oshry and John Stemberger
Case Number: 2:2010cv00793
Filed: September 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge: Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER: Given the entered Stipulation of Partial Voluntary Dismissal 121 which dismisses all claims against Defendant Stemberger, Documents 18 , 47 , 50 and 54 are dismissed as moot. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/26/2011. (dh1)
August 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 113 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs 94 motion for protective order for confidential information is DENIED. Plaintiff's 95 motion for an emergency temporary stay of discovery is WITHDRAWN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/15/11. (rew) Modified text on 8/16/2011 (er1).
April 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 75 OPINION AND ORDER overruling Defendant Geller's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order denying Defendant Geller's request for a protective order and denying Defendant Geller's Motion to Stay Magistrate Judge's Order to Proceed with Discovery 67 . Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 04/12/2011. (dh1)
April 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 OPINION AND ORDER granting 57 Motion for Leave to Intervene of Non-Parties Jon Doe and Barbarrossa for the Limited Purposes of Seeking and Enforcing a Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 4/4/2011. (er1)
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER re 67 Emergency Motion filed by Defendant Pamela Oshry to stay an order entered by the Magistrate Judge on 03/29/2011 66 . The Court orders the Plaintiff to file no later than 04/05/2011 any response to this motion. The Defendant's reply shall be filed no later than 04/06/2011. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 04/01/2011. (dh1)
December 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying 25 Plaintiffs' Motion to Treat Defendant Pamela Geller's Motion to Dismiss as a Summary Judgment Motion and granting 28 Plaintiffs' Motion for Continuance to Respond to Pamela Geller's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is directed to file his response to Defendant Geller's Motion to Dismiss by 12/21/2010. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 12/01/2010. (dh1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tarazi v. Oshry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Omar Tarazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pamela G Oshry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Stemberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?