Brown v. Timmerman-Cooper et al
Frank C Brown, Jr. |
Deb Timmerman-Cooper, Brian Cook and Gary Croft |
2:2010cv00967 |
October 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
MADISON |
John D. Holschuh |
Terence P Kemp |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 ORDER: As Mr. Brown does not meet the requirements to proceed in forma pauperis, he is assessed the full appellate filing fee of $455.00, payable within 30 days of the date of this order. If Mr. Brown fails to pay the entire filing fee within 30 days of this order, his appeal may be dismissed and may not be reinstated even upon full payment of the fee. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/14/2012. (dh1) |
Filing 84 JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 07/16/2012. This case is closed. (dh1) |
Filing 65 OPINION AND ORDER denying 35 Defendants' Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and to compel payment of full filing fees. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 01/12/2012. (dh1) |
Filing 61 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that 35 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the Alternative to Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status and Compel Payment of Full Filing Fees be granted and that the c omplaint be dismissed w/prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. It is further recommended that if the Court adopts this recommendation & dismisses the case that 18 , 38 , 39 , 43 and 53 all be denied as moot. It is further ordered that 52 MOTION for Leave to Supplement Pleadings and/or Strike Therefrom S.D.Ohio CivR. 7.2(a)(2) & 57 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 53 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Hearing are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 1/4/2012. (kk2) |
Filing 30 ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of 04/15/2011. The complaint is deemed amended to allege claims for monetary relief against the defendants in their individual capacities. The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 10 is denied. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/05/2011. (dh1) |
Filing 29 ORDER: For docketing purposes, in Case No. 2:10-cv-967, the Court notes that the Opinion and Order 28 issued on 05/04/2011, relates to the Magistrate Judge's Opinion and Order of 04/14/2011 at Doc. # 22 , and Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration at Doc. # 25 , as amended by Doc. # 26 . Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/04/2011. (dh1) |
Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER denying 12 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 14 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 04/14/2011. (sr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.