Penn, LLC et al v. Prosper Business Development Corporation, et al
Plaintiff: Penn, LLC and Bigresearch, LLC
Defendant: Prosper Business Development Corporation, Prosper Technologies, LLC, Phil Rist, Gary Drenik, James E. Arnold & Associates and James E. Arnold
Case Number: 2:2010cv00993
Filed: November 5, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: John D. Holschuh
Presiding Judge: Terence P Kemp
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 319 ORDER granting 318 Counterclaim Defendant Penn, LLC's Motion to Stay Execution and DIRECTS the Clerk to accept a cash Supersedeas Bond in the amount of $1,278,743.92. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 2/6/14. (sem1)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 316 JUDGMENT entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 1/8/14. (sem1)
December 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 312 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 311 Defendants Drenik and Rist's Motion to Vacate the Attorney Fees Hearing and for the Court in enter Final Judgment in this matter. The 12/5/13 Oral Hearing is VACATED, but the Court DENIES Defendants Drenik and Rist's request for this Court to enter Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 12/3/13. (sem1)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 289 ORDER memorializing Jury Trial. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 10/17/13. (sem1)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 255 ORDER denying 248 249 251 252 Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 8/20/13. (sem1)
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 254 ORDER denying 234 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' claims alleging Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Conversion/Unjust Enrichment and denying 236 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 8/19/13. (sem1)
July 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 240 OPINION AND ORDER granting 210 Sealed Motion to Compel the Re-Deposition of Bradford S Eldridge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 7/5/2013. (kk2)
June 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 237 ORDER granting 181 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 229 Sealed Motion. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 6/24/13. (kn)
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER granting 130 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on claims related to the MarketStar arbitration award and denying 137 Plaintiffs' Motion to Deny or Defer ruling on Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 2/14/13. (sem1)
February 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 179 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 119 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on claims barred by res judicata. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 2/8/13. (sem1)
November 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 173 ORDER granting 153 Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift the "Attorneys Eyes Only" designation with respect to certain documents. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 11/28/12. (sem1)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 135 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 113 & 115 Sealed MOTION for Order Compelling Discovery. Defendants have fourteen (14) days from the date of this order to produce the additional documents required. All documents shall be produced in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(b)(2)(E) to the extent possible. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 8/20/2012. (kk2)
December 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER re 84 MOTION to Appoint Receiver filed by Bigresearch, LLC and Penn, LLC; Non-oral hearing on said motion set for 2/10/2012. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 12/29/11. (sem1)
October 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER denying 52 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Dismissal of Claims Without Prejudice; granting 56 Defendants Rist and Drenik's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 74 Defendant Prosper Technologies, LLC's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 10/20/11. (sem1)
August 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying 37 the Law Firm Defendants' Motion for Sanctions; denying as moot 69 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 8/12/11. (sem1)
July 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER denying 33 Defendant Prosper's Motion for Sanctions; denying as moot 38 Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash; denying as moot 63 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 7/27/11. (sem1)
May 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 7 the Law Firm Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 8 Defendant Proper's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 5/27/11. (sem1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Penn, LLC et al v. Prosper Business Development Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Penn, LLC
Represented By: Amelia A Bower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bigresearch, LLC
Represented By: Amelia A Bower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prosper Business Development Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prosper Technologies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phil Rist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Drenik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E. Arnold & Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E. Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?