Collins v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
| Richard C Collins |
| Warden, Ross Correctional Institution and Alice Ault |
| 2:2010cv01161 |
| December 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| ROSS |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER denying 45 Plaintiff's 05/18/2012 motion to transfer this case to the Court of Appeals. Plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal 41 , but the Court has certified there are no arguable grounds for appeal 44 . If plaintiff believes there are arguable grounds for an appeal, he may seek a certificate of appealability for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/22/2012. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
42
DEFICIENCY ORDER: Plf to either pay the $455.00 filing fee or file a motion to proceed w/out prepayment of fees, supported by an executed application and affidavit by an incarcerated person w/in 30 days from the date of this Order. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 1/27/12. (sh1)
|
|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Order filed 11/04/2011. This case is CLOSED. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 19 Plaintiff's 07/15/2011 Motion for Reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's Order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 09/02/2011. (dh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
