Dodson v. Banks et al
Charles Lewis Dodson |
All Unknown Others, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Edward Banks and Venesa Sawyer |
2:2011cv00164 |
February 23, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
NOBLE |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Michael H. Watson |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER granting 18 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting 19 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 2/11/13. (jk1) |
Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 18 MOTION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 1/17/2013. (er1) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting 7 Wexford Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; and adopting 13 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/29/11. (jk1) |
Filing 13 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 MOTION to Dismiss: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED such that Plaintiff's claims against Wexford Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants' 12 MOTION to Strike is DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 12/1/2011. (er1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.