Ricks v. Powell Law Office, P.C.
Plaintiff: Heather Ricks
Defendant: Powell Law Office, P.C.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00667
Filed: July 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FAIRFIELD
Presiding Judge: Mark R. Abel
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER cancelling 14 March 13, 2012 mediation; Clerk to mail a copy of this order to mediator Ritchey Hollenbaugh, 366 E. Broad St., Cols., OH 43215. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 2/22/12. (sh1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ricks v. Powell Law Office, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Ricks
Represented By: David B Levin
Represented By: Mitchel Luxenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Powell Law Office, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?