Younker v. Ohio State University Medical Center et al
Plaintiff: |
Aaron D. Younker |
Defendant: |
Ohio State University Medical Center, Paul R. Beery, Stuart Hudson and Manufacturer of Porietex ProGrip Mesh |
Case Number: |
2:2011cv00749 |
Filed: |
August 17, 2011 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Office: |
Columbus Office |
County: |
FRANKLIN |
Presiding Judge: |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Presiding Judge: |
Gregory L Frost |
Nature of Suit: |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 16, 2013 |
Filing
111
ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 109 in that 90 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 7/16/13. (sem1)
|
June 25, 2013 |
Filing
109
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 90 First MOTION for Summary Judgment: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Defendants' 100 MOTION to Strike 98 Plaintiff's Sur-Reply is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 6/25/2013. (er1)
|
November 9, 2012 |
Filing
88
ORDER denying without prejudice 83 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery; denying 82 Plaintiff's Motion to Take Depositions; denying 85 Plaintiff's Motion for a Stenographer for the Taking of Depositions; denying 86 Plaintiff's Motion for Special Prosecutor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 11/9/2012. (er1)
|
May 31, 2012 |
Filing
57
ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 in that the 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Stuart Hudson is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 5/31/12. (sem1)
|
April 25, 2012 |
Filing
46
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court DENY Defendant Hudson's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Plaintiff's 32 Motion to Amend is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 4/25/2012. (er1)
|
October 26, 2011 |
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 in that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants The Ohio State University Medical Center, Paul R. Beery, and the Manufacturer of the Porietex ProGrip Mesh are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 10/26/11. (sem1)
|
September 29, 2011 |
Filing
6
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 Complaint: At this time, Plaintiff may proceed on his claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs against Defendant Hudson. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS the remainder of Plain tiff's claims, and the remaining Defendants, without prejudice. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve a summons, complaint and this Order to Defendant Hudson by way of certified mail. Defendant Hudson is ORDERED to answer or otherwise r espond to the Complaint within 45 days of being served. Coutresy copy of the complaint and this order, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send to the Attorney General of Ohio. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 9/29/11. (er1)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?