Watiker v. The Hartford Insurance
Plaintiff: Wanda Watiker
Defendant: The Hartford Insurance
Case Number: 2:2011cv00918
Filed: October 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: MUSKINGUM
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Presiding Judge: Gregory L Frost
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and granting 17 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 10/29/12. (sem1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watiker v. The Hartford Insurance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda Watiker
Represented By: Miles Douglas Fries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Hartford Insurance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?