Harper v. Donehue et al
| Henry N. Harper |
| Lindsey K. Donehue and Frank A. McClure & Associates |
| 2:2011cv00939 |
| October 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| GUERNSEY |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Peter C Economus |
| Civil Rights |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1109 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's purported federal causes of action are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's remaining state-law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as the Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Signed by Senior Judge Peter C Economus on 2/9/12. (jr1)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Complaint: ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is assessed the full amount of the Court's $350.00 filing fee. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court DIS MISS Plaintiff's purported federal causes of action for failure to state a claim. Moreover, it is RECOMMENDED that the Court DECLINE to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims and that the Court DISMISS these claims without prejudice. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 11/18/2011. (er1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
