Lawroski v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
J Philip Lawroski |
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Lynda Butler |
2:2011cv01074 |
December 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Edmund A Sargus |
Employment |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 11/01/13. This case is CLOSED. (dh1) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial Date. The Court will not extend the date of trial scheduled for 12/10/13. However, the Court modifies the other deadlines as set forth in its Scheduling Order. The Settlement Conference is rescheduled to 11/5/2013 at 9:30 and the Final Pretrial Conference is rescheduled to 12/2/2013 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 10/17/2013. (dh1) |
Filing 19 ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 10/29/2013 at 11:00 AM; Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/27/2013 at 9:00 AM; and Jury Trial set for 12/10/2013 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 02/12/13. (Attachment: FPTO Form) (dh1) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying without prejudice 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. The Court will hold a status conference on 1/9/2013 at 2:00P to resolve any remaining discovery disputes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 12/17/2012. (er1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.