Abercrombie & Fitch Co v. ACE EUROPEAN GROUP, LIMITED
| Abercrombie & Fitch Co |
| ACE EUROPEAN GROUP, LIMITED |
| 2:2011cv01114 |
| December 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| George C Smith |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 79 Motion to Stay; granting in part and denying in part 84 Motion ; granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 97 Motion to Exclude. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 9/29/14. (lvw1)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER granting 47 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 57 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 9/13/13. (lvw1)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER denying Ace's 33 Motion to Strike; granting Abercrombie's 25 Motion to File a Supplemental Complaint. Abercrombie did not sign the proposed Supplemental Complaint that it attached to its Motion as Exhibit One and is therefore DIRECTED to file the Supplemental Complaint within Seven Days of the Date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 9/19/2012. (er1)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 2 Ace's Motion to Change Venue and denying 21 Abercrombie's Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 7/23/2012. (er1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
