Bennett v. White Tiger, Inc. et al
| Zackary W Bennett |
| White Tiger, Inc. and George Peyton |
| 2:2012cv00171 |
| February 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| MADISON |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Order filed 10/15/2013. This case is CLOSED. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 1/14/2014 at 11:00 AM; Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/13/2014 at 9:00 AM; and Jury Trial set for 2/24/2014 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 06/17/2013. (Attachment: FPTO Form) (dh1)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER "VACATING" # 14 Notice of March 15, 2013 Settlement Mediation; Status report due by 4/5/13; Clerk to mail a copy of this order to Mediator Mary Beth Foley, 140 E. Town St., Cols. OH 43215. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 3/8/13. (sh1)
|
|
Filing
13
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 3 the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants White Tiger, Inc. and George Peyton. In light of the Court's 06/07/12 Pretrial Conference as well as this Opinion and Order, Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Motion 5 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 01/15/2013. (dh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
