Gimbrone v. Krisher et al
Gregory Gimbrone |
Dr. Krisher, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Ms. Higginbotham and Mr. Free |
2:2012cv00251 |
March 22, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
ROSS |
Gregory L Frost |
Terence P Kemp |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 65 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings be granted. Objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 4/9/2013. (kk2) |
Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER denying 42 Motion to Supplement Amended Complaint, 50 Motion for Extension of Time, 56 Motion for Teleconference, 59 Motion to Strike & 60 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 2/7/2013. (kk2) |
Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 in that 3 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Gregory Gimbrone is DENIED, 30 Defendants' Motion to Strike filed by Mr. Free, Dr. Krisher, Ms. Higginbotham and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Reply 29 is STRICKEN from the record in this case. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 10/9/12. (sem1) |
Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunctive Relief filed by Gregory Gimbrone be denied. Objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 7/20/2012. (kk2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.