Bubar v. Herlihy Moving and Storage Inc et al
Plaintiff: Ronald O. Bubar
Defendant: Mayflower Transit LLC
Case Number: 2:2012cv00359
Filed: April 23, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: JACKSON
Presiding Judge: Mark R. Abel
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit: Commercial/ICC Rates/etc.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: this case is reported settled; dismissal entry due w/in 2 wks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 10/23/12. (sh1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bubar v. Herlihy Moving and Storage Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald O. Bubar
Represented By: William Steven Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayflower Transit LLC
Represented By: Marc S Blubaugh
Represented By: Thomas Brent Kern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?