Blake v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Robert S Blake |
| APR Mortgage Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Century Mortgage Company of Kentucky, Prominent Title Agency, LLC and Landstar Title, LLC |
| 2:2012cv00467 |
| May 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| DELAWARE |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Gregory L Frost |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 in that Defendant APR Mortgage is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 1/17/13. (sem1)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 1/10/13. (sem1)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 33 Defendants' Landstar and Prominent's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and granting 28 Defendant's Century's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 1/4/13. (sem1)
|
|
Filing
46
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Defendant APR Mortgage: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's claims against APR Mortgage without prejudice for failure to make timely service pursuant to Rule 4(m). Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 12/27/2012. (er1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
