Mathews et al v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement System
| Richard Mathews and Sandra Matthews |
| Ohio Public Employees Retirement System |
| 2:2012cv01033 |
| November 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Gregory L Frost |
| Norah McCann King |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ECF 26 , is DENIED to the extent that the motion seeks summary judgment on plaintiff's claims. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF 32 , is GRANTED. Defenda nt is granted judgment on plaintiff's claims and on its counterclaim. The Court AWARDS defendant $106,672.54 pursuant to O.R.C. § 145.563 for the overpayment of disability benefits paid to plaintiff between January 2010 and April 2012, and may collect that amount in accordance with the procedures established in O.R.C. § 145.563(B). Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 3/12/2015. (pes1)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 27 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaim Instanter; DENYING 26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Plaintiff, Richard Mathews. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 9/23/2014. (pes1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
