Nelson v. Jackson et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Copenhaver Nelson
Defendant: Wanza Jackson, William Gallar, Steven Cahill and State of Ohio
Case Number: 2:2012cv01167
Filed: November 29, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: MADISON
Presiding Judge: James L Graham
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 105 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 5/8/2015. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 105 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 101 MOTION for Reconsideration re 100 Judgment filed by Joshua Copenhaver Nelson. Should this matter be remanded to this Court for consideration of plaintiff's Motion to Amend and Relief from Judgment, ECF 101 , it is RECOMMENDED that the Motion be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 11/17/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 10/29/2014. (pes1)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting 92 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 97 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 9/18/2014. (ds)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 97 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants Wanza Jackson, Steven Cahill, and William Gallar's Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 92 , be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 9/5/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/19/14. (jr1)
February 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER denying 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 81 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief are dismissed as moot. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 2/13/2014. (ds)
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Joshua Copenhaver Nelson. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that, based upon the agreement of the parties, that plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief be DISMISSED as moot. Objections to R&R due by 2/3/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 1/15/2014. (pes1)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommendations re 45 Report and Recommendations.; denying 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 8/20/13. (ds)
July 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying re 24 & 41 motion to strike. It is recommended that re 36 motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim be granted in part and denied in part, it is also recommended that re 12 motion for preliminary injunction be denied. Objections to R&R due by 8/5/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 7/18/13. (rew)
April 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 34 Report and Recommendations.; denying 14 Motion for entry of default. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 4/11/13. (ds)
March 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying re 18 motion to strike and granting re 33 motion for extension of time to file answer. It is recommended that 14 motion for entry of default be denied. Objections to R&R due by 4/5/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 3/19/13. (rew)
December 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL SCREEN OF THE COMPLAINT: The United States Marshal Service will effect service of process by certified mail. each defendant may have forty-five (45) days service of process to respond. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 12/19/12. (rew)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nelson v. Jackson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Copenhaver Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wanza Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Gallar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Cahill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Ohio
Represented By: Judith B Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?