Wilson et al v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
| Paul Gary Wilson, Judy Ann Wilson, Charles DeVere Wilson, Carleen Fay Wilson, Shawn Paul Wilson, Katherine Nicole Wilson and Geopetro LLC |
| Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC |
| 2:2012cv01203 |
| December 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| RICHLAND |
| Mark R. Abel |
| James L Graham |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 717 Natural Gas Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
585
ORDER finding as moot 248 and 283 Motions to Dismiss; granting 356 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 02/27/2015. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
559
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Columbia Gass motions for default judgment (docs. 464, 470, 476, 483, 496, 508, 511,522, 528, 531 and 549) be DENIED - objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 02/05/2015. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
552
ORDER granting 485 Motion to Set Aside Entries of Default; denying 503 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 02/02/2015. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
360
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Defendant shall answer Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF No. 2) by 08/08/2014. Defendant shall file reply briefs in support of its motions to dismiss counterclaims (ECF Nos. 247 and 248) by 08/08/2014. Counter-Defendants shall file re sponses to Defendants motions to dismiss filed on 09/06/2013 (ECF No. 252) and 09/17/2013 (ECF No.254) by 08/08/2014; any reply briefs will be submitted in accordance with this Courts Local Civil Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 08/01/2014. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
303
ORDER re counterclaim plaintiff Columbia Gas's request that the Clerk of Court serve the second amended counterclaim (doc. 288) and notice of condemnation (doc. 287) on counterclaim defendants that it was unable to serve personally. S.D. Ohio C iv. Rule 4.2. This Order proposes that a joint notice be served on these counterclaim defendants and asks counsel for all interested parties to respond to this proposal within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 7/11/2014. (Abel, Mark)
|
|
Filing
296
Status and Scheduling conference Order. A status and scheduling conference was held 7/8/2014. Pending motions to dismiss, who should be the fact-finder (jury or land commissioners), plaintiffs' claims and defendant's defenses, discovery are as, sequencing of discovery and motions practice, and barriers to settlement were discussed. A proposed case management order is due 7/25/2014. It is ORDERED that, as to counterclaim defendants who have not responded to the counterclaims served on th em, Columbia Gas Transmission does not need to make paper service of its return of service on other counterclaim defend-ants on them. Counsel are drafting a proposed order that will more generally address service of filings on unrepresented counterclaim defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 7/9/2014. (Abel, Mark)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: in re the May 28, 2013 teleconference held with the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 6/12/13. (sh1)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Edmund A Sargus recused. Case reassigned to Judge James L Graham for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 01/03/2013. (dh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
