Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Havens
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Michael C. Havens
Case Number: 2:2013cv00093
Filed: February 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: PICKAWAY
Presiding Judge: Gregory L Frost
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 11 Plts' Motion to Strike Dft's Affirmative Defenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 7/25/203. (sln1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Havens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael C. Havens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey L Koberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?