Gillie et al v. Law Office of Eric A. Jones, LLC et al
| Pamela Gillie and Hazel Meadows |
| Law Office of Eric A. Jones, LLC, Eric A. Jones, Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder, & Bringardner Co., LPA, Mark Sheriff and Sarah Sheriff |
| 2:2013cv00212 |
| March 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| James L Graham |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER granting 47 & 51 Motions for Summary Judgment; denying 46 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 48 , 49 & 50 Motions for Summary Judgment; denying 70 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 41 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 8/12/2014. (er1)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER - The Court ORDERS that this case be bifurcated. The parties shall submit dispositive motions within 60 days of this Order being entered. The Courts Order staying discovery will remain in place pending resolution of the liability issues in this case. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 12/4/2013. (ds)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER granting 3 the OAG's Motion to Intervene as a Defendant and Counterclaimant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 8/21/2013. (er)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
