Motter, Jr. et al v. O'Brien et al
| Mark Motter, Jr. and Lavanda Terrell |
| Kevin J. O'Brien & Associates, Co., L.P.A., Jonathan M. Layman and Kevin J. O'Brien |
| 2:2013cv00216 |
| March 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT in favor of Lavanda Terrell, Mark Motter, Jr. against Kevin J. O'Brien & Associates, Co., L.P.A., Jonathan M. Layman, Kevin J. O'Brien. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 09/26/2014. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER: The Court finds that it has jurisdiction over this action and the parties to the proposed settlement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a) and 1332(d), and that the proposed settlement class satisfies the requirements of a settlement class because the class members are readily ascertainable and a well-defined community of interest exists in the questions of law and fact affecting the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 06/12/2014. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Cancel Sept. 10, 2013 Settl Mediation; Clerk to mail a copy of this order to Mediator Kevin McDermott, 41 S. High St., Ste. 3300, 43215. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 8/29/13. (sh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
