Sturtz v. JPMorgan Chase & Co dba JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
Deborah Sturtz |
Stefano Peroni, Thomas Dowell and JPMorgan Chase & Co dba JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association |
2:2013cv00236 |
March 13, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
DELAWARE |
Norah McCann King |
Edmund A Sargus |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER vacating the telephone status conference scheduled for 07/07/14 and scheduling an in-person status conference for 07/14/14 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel and principals are directed to appear at this conference. There will be no continuances permitted. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 07/07/2014. (dh1) |
Filing 33 ORDER: The Court held an in-person status conference on 6/2/14 and a telephone status conference on 6/16/14 re the parties' settlement, which the parties agree occurred, but dispute what the terms of that settlement included. The parties are d irected to telephone the Court by 6/27/14 to report the progress of the settlement. If the parties have not finalized an agreement, a mandatory in-person conference will all principals and counsel will be scheduled. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 06/24/2014. (dh1) |
Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER denying 21 Motion to Quash; denying 28 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 5/22/2014. (pes1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.